Mollie Clark

Associate

She/Her

Maintaining a broad litigation practice, Mollie is part of our insurance, health, and privacy, defamation and media law groups.

[email protected]

vcard

print

Biography

Mollie has a general civil litigation practice representing clients in professional liability, bodily injury, product liability, bad faith claims, and privacy matters. She also represents clients before various administrative tribunals, including the Safety Standards Appeal Board, Residential Tenancy Branch, Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal, Human Rights Tribunal, and Civil Resolution Tribunal.

Mollie has appeared before the British Columbia Provincial Court, Supreme Court, and Court of Appeal. She has experience with chambers proceedings, hearings, and trial. She also has experience with alternative dispute resolution mediums.

Mollie is a founding director of the Hutch Fund Society, a charity founded in North Vancouver that fundraises for the mental health community. Prior to working with the Hutch Fund Society, she volunteered at various other organizations including the Atira Women’s Resource Society, Pro Bono Students Canada, Access Pro Bono Society of BC and GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre.

Having articled with Harper Grey, Mollie has spent the bulk of her legal career at the Firm.

Assistance Team

Legal Administrative Assistant

Karen Liu

Legal Administrative Assistant

[email protected] Contact by email

Expertise

Workplace Law Family Law

Education

University of Victoria, J.D., 2018
University of British Columbia, B.A., 2013

Bar Admission

British Columbia, 2019

Languages spoken

English

Experience

Professional Credentials

Leadership

Hutch Fund Society, Director of Marketing
Life in Law, Guest Blogger

Memberships

Canadian Bar Association, BC Branch, Member
The Law Society of British Columbia, Member

Get in touch with

Mollie Clark

[email protected]

The Latest

A battle between experts is to be fought in a trial proper: conflicts in expert evidence weigh against suitability for summary trial

A battle between experts is to be fought in a trial proper: conflicts in expert evidence weigh against suitability for summary trial

Insurance Law Blog A battle between experts is to be fought in a trial proper: conflicts in expert evidence weigh against suitability for summary trial by Mollie Clark
November 29, 2023

The Court will not interpret coverage under an insurance policy so generously so as to amount to ignoring the terms and wording of a policy

The Court will not interpret coverage under an insurance policy so generously so as to amount to ignoring the terms and wording of a policy

Insurance Law Blog The Court will not interpret coverage under an insurance policy so generously so as to amount to ignoring the terms and wording of a policy by Mollie Clark
July 25, 2023

Mollie Clark to Participate in UBC Women at Work Panel

Mollie Clark to Participate in UBC Women at Work Panel

Events & Presentations Mollie Clark to Participate in UBC Women at Work Panel by Mollie Clark
March 16, 2023

Harper Grey proud to support and attend TLABC Oral Advocacy Society Panel Event

Harper Grey proud to support and attend TLABC Oral Advocacy Society Panel Event

News Harper Grey proud to support and attend TLABC Oral Advocacy Society Panel Event by Mollie Clark
February 27, 2023

What you don’t know can hurt you: an exclusion clause for failure to prevent an assault may exclude coverage for negligently failing to prevent assault without having any direct knowledge the assault was going to occur

What you don’t know can hurt you: an exclusion clause for failure to prevent an assault may exclude coverage for negligently failing to prevent assault without having any direct knowledge the assault was going to occur

Insurance Law Blog What you don’t know can hurt you: an exclusion clause for failure to prevent an assault may exclude coverage for negligently failing to prevent assault without having any direct knowledge the assault was going to occur by Mollie Clark
February 14, 2023

Once and for all: a definition for a term that appears in an insurance policy applies to the same term appearing in an excess endorsement unless the endorsement explicitly modifies the definition

Once and for all: a definition for a term that appears in an insurance policy applies to the same term appearing in an excess endorsement unless the endorsement explicitly modifies the definition

Insurance Law Blog Once and for all: a definition for a term that appears in an insurance policy applies to the same term appearing in an excess endorsement unless the endorsement explicitly modifies the definition by Mollie Clark
February 14, 2023

Stay in your own lane: when asked to review a decision of an administrative tribunal, the Court ought to decline jurisdiction where there is another process available that is more appropriate to the adjudication of the claim

Stay in your own lane: when asked to review a decision of an administrative tribunal, the Court ought to decline jurisdiction where there is another process available that is more appropriate to the adjudication of the claim

Administrative Law Blog Stay in your own lane: when asked to review a decision of an administrative tribunal, the Court ought to decline jurisdiction where there is another process available that is more appropriate to the adjudication of the claim by Mollie Clark
June 21, 2022

You make the rules, or else you have to play fair: a society is entitled to create its own procedures, and in doing so may violate some principles of natural justice, as long as it does so expressly in its bylaws

You make the rules, or else you have to play fair: a society is entitled to create its own procedures, and in doing so may violate some principles of natural justice, as long as it does so expressly in its bylaws

Administrative Law Blog You make the rules, or else you have to play fair: a society is entitled to create its own procedures, and in doing so may violate some principles of natural justice, as long as it does so expressly in its bylaws by Mollie Clark
June 21, 2022

No harm, no foul. Where a breach of procedural fairness has been established, the Court will not find there was a reviewable error unless the breach affected the outcome

No harm, no foul. Where a breach of procedural fairness has been established, the Court will not find there was a reviewable error unless the breach affected the outcome

Administrative Law Blog No harm, no foul. Where a breach of procedural fairness has been established, the Court will not find there was a reviewable error unless the breach affected the outcome by Mollie Clark
February 22, 2022

I take it back! In certain circumstances, an administrative body can correct a breach in procedural fairness by reopening the relevant decision

I take it back! In certain circumstances, an administrative body can correct a breach in procedural fairness by reopening the relevant decision

Administrative Law Blog I take it back! In certain circumstances, an administrative body can correct a breach in procedural fairness by reopening the relevant decision by Mollie Clark
February 22, 2022

Fair is fair: where statutory interpretation is the core issue decided upon following written and oral submissions, it is not procedurally unfair for the decision maker to rely on a particular term contained in the regulations being interpreted about which submissions were not specifically made

Fair is fair: where statutory interpretation is the core issue decided upon following written and oral submissions, it is not procedurally unfair for the decision maker to rely on a particular term contained in the regulations being interpreted about which submissions were not specifically made

Administrative Law Blog Fair is fair: where statutory interpretation is the core issue decided upon following written and oral submissions, it is not procedurally unfair for the decision maker to rely on a particular term contained in the regulations being interpreted about which submissions were not specifically made by Mollie Clark
December 21, 2021

There are no shortcuts to judicial review: judicial review will not be available where there is an adequate alternative remedy. A limited right of appeal from decisions of an administrative body to the Court constitutes an adequate alternative remedy

There are no shortcuts to judicial review: judicial review will not be available where there is an adequate alternative remedy. A limited right of appeal from decisions of an administrative body to the Court constitutes an adequate alternative remedy

Administrative Law Blog There are no shortcuts to judicial review: judicial review will not be available where there is an adequate alternative remedy. A limited right of appeal from decisions of an administrative body to the Court constitutes an adequate alternative remedy by Mollie Clark
December 21, 2021

That’s reasonable, right? The standard of review regarding questions of procedural fairness met by an administrative decision maker is not correctness, but rather whether the standard of fairness required by the common law has been met

That’s reasonable, right? The standard of review regarding questions of procedural fairness met by an administrative decision maker is not correctness, but rather whether the standard of fairness required by the common law has been met

Administrative Law Blog That’s reasonable, right? The standard of review regarding questions of procedural fairness met by an administrative decision maker is not correctness, but rather whether the standard of fairness required by the common law has been met by Mollie Clark
September 21, 2021

It’s all in the context: the content of hospital privileges and assessment of what constitutes constructive revocation of privileges is highly contextual, to be examined on a case by case basis

It’s all in the context: the content of hospital privileges and assessment of what constitutes constructive revocation of privileges is highly contextual, to be examined on a case by case basis

Administrative Law Blog It’s all in the context: the content of hospital privileges and assessment of what constitutes constructive revocation of privileges is highly contextual, to be examined on a case by case basis by Mollie Clark
July 20, 2021

It’s all fair game: the scope of an investigation ordered pursuant to British Columbia Law Society Rule 4-55 encompasses a broad investigation of the member’s entire legal practice and is not limited to the concerns that triggered the investigation

It’s all fair game: the scope of an investigation ordered pursuant to British Columbia Law Society Rule 4-55 encompasses a broad investigation of the member’s entire legal practice and is not limited to the concerns that triggered the investigation

Administrative Law Blog It’s all fair game: the scope of an investigation ordered pursuant to British Columbia Law Society Rule 4-55 encompasses a broad investigation of the member’s entire legal practice and is not limited to the concerns that triggered the investigation by Mollie Clark
July 20, 2021